Skip to content
Publication

Land restitution, housing policy, and productive projects: Ideas for the post-agreement period

This document aims to examine the results of the land restitution process, with emphasis on its articulation with housing and income generation policies, central components that restitution and return require in order to guarantee victims decent living conditions in terms of livability and economic sustainability.

Read More
Column

Restitution, Cabal, and Kafka

Neither the land restitution jurisdiction, nor the complaintants who Cabal calls “lazy criminals that don’t like to work,” nor much less the vulnerable rural workers that occupy the requested pieces of land.

Read More
Post

International Meeting: Land Restitution and Territorial Rights

The meeting, organized by the National University, Dejusticia, the Office for Restitution, and the Swiss Embassy, seeks to encourage exchanges of reflections and local, national, and international experiences about land restitution processes and territorial rights from the approaches of “Do No Harm” and Transitional Justice.

Read More
Column

Although imperfect, peace should also arrive to rural areas

Throughout the 20th century, Colombia passed a series of agrarian laws that regulated ownership and exploitation of the land, one of the most important causes of armed conflict. The most important were Law 200 of 1936, Law 135 of 1961, Law 1 of 1968, and Law 160 of 1994. All were ambitious proposals. Nonetheless, the implementation of these laws has been a failure.

Read More
Column

Land Restitution: A Matter of Justice

It has been a difficult process and there is much more to do. But the criticisms by the Solicitor General and the ranchers’ union do not have any basis when, in the contrary, they should have to double their efforts to repair the damages of such a brutal war.

Read More
Post

Why Are the Regulations of the New National Development Plan Regarding Paramos and Development Projects of National Strategic Interest Unconstitutional?

With six votes in favor and two against, the Constitutional Court ruled that the article of the National Development Plan that permits mining in paramos is unconstitutional.

Moreover, with a 5-3 vote, the Court decided that victims’ rights to land restitution supercedes Development Projects of National Strategic Interest.

In August 2015 Dejusticia intervened in this litigation arguing these measures’ unconstitutionality.

Read More
Artículo de Litigio

Intervention Litigating Unconstitutionality of the Expression “Free of Blame” of the Evidenciary Requirements of Good Faith Which Is Necessary to Access Economic Compensation

We intervened before the Constitutional Court litigating the unconstitutionality of the formulated expression “free of blame” of the evidenciary standards of good faith, contained in the Law 1448 of 2011 (Victims and Land Restitution Law) that is a requirement to access economic compensation.

Read More
Artículo de Litigio

Can a Criminal Law Judge Suspend a Land Restitution Process?

We intervened before the Constitutional Court in a writ of constitutional protection case, in which a criminal law judge ordered, as a precautionary measure, to suspend a land restitution process. The criminal case investigated the alleged procedural fraud in the land restitution process by the plaintiffs. According to the litigants (who act as defendants in the land restitution case), the restitution plaintiffs committed procedural fraud by arguing that the seeling of the land in question constitutes legal displacement.

Read More
Column

Obtaining Restitution?

While the Solicitor General publishes reports about the implementation of the Victims’ Law, in some restitution processes he has protected and favored opposing interests.

Read More
Artículo de Litigio

Expert Opinion about Administrative Reparations before the Inter-American Human Rights Court

Camilo Sánchez, transitional justice research coordinator, presented an expert opinion about the administrative reparations program and the compliance of the Land Restitution and Victims’ Law to international standards before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, within the framework of the case “Yarce and others v. Colombia.”

Read More
Post

Land Reform in Colombia: One step Forward Two Steps Back

Land reform in Colombia, while politically sensitive, is necessary to stabilize the country and end a violent conflict that has plagued Colombians for more than half a century. Colombia’s internal fighting has deprived millions of their land and livelihood. Adopted in June 2011, Colombia’s Victims and Land Restitution Law, also known as Law 1448, is an important advance in providing restitution for those displaced by the conflict.

Read More
Powered by swapps
Scroll To Top