Skip to content

Antidiscriminación

Litigio

Demanda a la designación del Superintendente de Salud por incumplimiento del Presidente Juan Manuel Santos a la ley de cuotas

Dejusticia argued that while Law 581 of 2000 (Quotas Law) requires that 30 percent of Superintendents must be headed by women, when Santos appointed the Health Superintendent, this left the ...
Lea más

Demanda a la designación del director de Colciencias por incumplimiento del Presidente Juan Manuel Santos a la ley de cuotas

Dejusticia argued that while Law 581 of 2000 (Quotas Law) requires that 30 percent of Superintendents must be headed by women, when Santos appointed a male Director of Colciencias Health ...
Lea más

Intervención ante la CIDH en el caso que estudia la prohibición de la fecundación invitro

We consider that the American Convention, read in light of human rights instruments, protects the right to access the highest level of scientific development for the exercise of the reproductive ...
Lea más

Intervención en proceso de tutela por vulneración del derecho a la información pública y otros, en contra la Procuraduría

We argue that officials have a duty to provide truthful and impartial information in order for citizens to exercise their rights. By virtue of their public functions, officials have a ...
Lea más

Intervención en proceso de tutela sobre discursos discriminatorios.

In this intervention, Dejusticia analyzed the scope of the rights in tension: the rights to academic freedom and freedom of expression and the right to equality, specifically the prohibition of ...
Lea más

Amicus frente a tutela sobre interrupción voluntaria del embarazo (IVE) por riesgo para la salud mental de la mujer.

Given the many failures of the health system operators in this case, which demonstrate the difficulties of providing adequate treatment when the woman's mental health is in danger, we propose ...
Lea más

Intervención en incidente de nulidad de la T-769 de 2009

In this intervention, Dejusticia argues that the ruling in T-769/2009 did not change the legal precedent, as alleged by the applicants, but rather clarified the extent of the right to ...
Lea más
Powered by swapps
Scroll To Top